Mark Chagall |
Monday, December 10, 2012
Phthalocyanine Blue
I've been thinking about the colour blue a lot lately. Not because I've got the "blues" (when in fact I've been feeling chipper and sproingy) but because I've used red in a few of my paintings for class and want to cool off a bit. Blue is reflective, peaceful, spiritual.
I remember sitting in front of these windows (or a version of) when I visited the Chicago Institute with my graphic design class back in 2000 (!). I was at peace. I felt whole and loved. That's what I'm feeling these days too :)
Thursday, December 6, 2012
Assignment 5: independent proj (post 2)
Here's the 2nd post about the independent project.
The painting was turning into a field of self-portraits. In a sense the painting was retaining/exposing the memory of the previous steps: showing the process which is something digital imagery cannot do without looking super-contrived. Digital cameras are fantastic at capturing a split second and recording millions of colours beyond what our eyes can recognize . . . but each frame/image does not have a connection with the frame/image that just came before it. Photography and video are great medium to capture time . . . but only linear time (ie. 3:00-3:15). A painting can capture lateral time: the underpainting done on Nov 2 shows through when worked on Nov 4 which plays off some marks which have been obliterated and reworked from Nov 3. Kind of a stretch . . . but it's an idea I'm still working out :P
The development of the field below:
At this point, we had our crit for this assignment. Some of the feedback I got was that I could push the field idea a little further by having some of the yellow hot spots on the periphery of the canvas because it still looks like figure-ground. Another comment was that even though this is a reaction to/stab at the screen, it still shares alot of common ground with it: the static-like quality in some areas and the language of the skype image (ie. here i am in front of my laptop taking screen shots of myself). This painting relates closely to Gerhard Richter's representational paintings were he has painted closely from a commercial photo of (for instance) a flower which he then reasserts the plastic nature of the painting by blurring the edges with a tiny brush.
Here's my final:
The painting was turning into a field of self-portraits. In a sense the painting was retaining/exposing the memory of the previous steps: showing the process which is something digital imagery cannot do without looking super-contrived. Digital cameras are fantastic at capturing a split second and recording millions of colours beyond what our eyes can recognize . . . but each frame/image does not have a connection with the frame/image that just came before it. Photography and video are great medium to capture time . . . but only linear time (ie. 3:00-3:15). A painting can capture lateral time: the underpainting done on Nov 2 shows through when worked on Nov 4 which plays off some marks which have been obliterated and reworked from Nov 3. Kind of a stretch . . . but it's an idea I'm still working out :P
The development of the field below:
The baseline for the field: figure-ground becoming confused |
Adding colour now to evoke glaring hues of a monitor |
Scraped back. The greys begin to act as a lift-off point for the raw hues. |
Reinforcing the colour: also solidifying some shapes |
Interesting ridges and textures begin to form and helps to fragment the image |
Playing with the balance of grey and colour |
Scraping the wet paint back with a squeegee brings the viewer back to "This is paint on a flat surface!" |
Strengthened some contours with line . . . not sure if it was needed . . . |
Developing a really nice thick surface of paint! |
A few final touch ups! |
At this point, we had our crit for this assignment. Some of the feedback I got was that I could push the field idea a little further by having some of the yellow hot spots on the periphery of the canvas because it still looks like figure-ground. Another comment was that even though this is a reaction to/stab at the screen, it still shares alot of common ground with it: the static-like quality in some areas and the language of the skype image (ie. here i am in front of my laptop taking screen shots of myself). This painting relates closely to Gerhard Richter's representational paintings were he has painted closely from a commercial photo of (for instance) a flower which he then reasserts the plastic nature of the painting by blurring the edges with a tiny brush.
Here's my final:
Memory Screen, 48" by 36", oil on canvas, 2012 |
Monday, December 3, 2012
Assignment 5: independent proj (post 1)
For our independent project, I set out to make a painting that would be a reaction/commentary on the effect that the screen/digital image has on our perception of images. I began 4 self-portraits using photos taken on the camera on my laptop in ambiguous expressions. I wanted to combine each of these images somehow to show what a painting can do that a typical screen can't.
This first post shows some of the early stages.
This lead me to discover that the painting could be about creating a field of self-portraits. (next post . . . stay tuned)
This first post shows some of the early stages.
I would paint in each portrait very roughly |
Then scrape it away with a squigee (inspired by Gerhard Richter) |
Then paint the next portrait over-top |
The scrape it away hoping some of the previous image would show through |
The plane starts to get cluttered very fast so the issue of figure-ground started to become a problem |
I had to "cheat" a little with my process and build up some of the portraits from earlier stages |
I thought maybe the fourth portrait would stand out more than the rest |
But scraping it back brought it onto the same plane as the rest of the painting |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)